Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Play’n GO

Play’n GO

Hacksaw Gaming

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
Published RTP: 96.50% against 96.20% — Perfect Gems is 0.30 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 2.0×: 5,000× against 10,000×, with Sails of Riches higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility labels differ: Medium against High. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Perfect Gems returns more in theory over the long run, while Sails of Riches reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Shared theme signals: Wealth.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.50% against 96.39% — Perfect Gems is 0.11 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 2.5×: 5,000× against 12,500×, with Supreme Zeus higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Supreme Zeus does not publish a rating.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Perfect Gems returns more in theory over the long run, while Supreme Zeus reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.

Add to the comparison (up to four)