Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Photo Safari
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.14%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 5×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Animals
VS
Mermaids Millions
Microgaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.56%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Greek myth, Animals
VS
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Photo Safari vs Mermaids Millions
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.14% against 96.56% — Mermaids Millions is 0.42 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Low.
- Shared theme signals: Animals.
Photo Safari vs Magic Piggy OG
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.14% against 96.20% — Magic Piggy OG is 0.06 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 500.0×: 5× against 2,500×, with Magic Piggy OG higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Magic Piggy OG does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Animals.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
