Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Play’n GO

Play’n GO

PG Soft

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
Published RTP: 96.14% against 96.08% — Photo Safari is 0.06 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5× and 5×.
Both carry the same volatility label: Low.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Photo Safari returns more in theory over the long run, while Fortune Teller reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.

Different format families: Photo Safari is Fixed paylines, Legendary Monkey King is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Play’n GO and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.14% against 96.71% — Legendary Monkey King is 0.57 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 10000.0×: 5× against 50,000×, with Legendary Monkey King higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Legendary Monkey King does not publish a rating.
Shared theme signals: Animals.

Add to the comparison (up to four)