Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Planet Fortune
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 2,500×
- Reels
- 500
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
Lucky Tiger
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 2,500×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
Dragon Hatch 2
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.76%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 2,500×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Planet Fortune vs Lucky Tiger
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.50% against 96.50%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 2,500× and 2,500×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia.
Planet Fortune vs Dragon Hatch 2
- Different format families: Planet Fortune is Fixed paylines, Dragon Hatch 2 is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.50% against 96.76% — Dragon Hatch 2 is 0.26 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 2,500× and 2,500×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Dragon Hatch 2 does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
