Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Prissy Princess
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.56%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 1,250×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Jolly Roger
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 97.00%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 928×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Mermaids Millions
Microgaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.56%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Greek myth, Animals
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Prissy Princess vs Jolly Roger
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 96.56% against 97.00% — Jolly Roger is 0.44 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.3×: 1,250× against 928×, with Prissy Princess higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Low.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Jolly Roger returns more in theory over the long run, while Prissy Princess reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Prissy Princess vs Mermaids Millions
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.56% against 96.56%.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Low.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
