Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Rascal Riches
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.23%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 9,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
3x Catch
Booongo
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Animals, Wealth
VS
Book of Golden Sands
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.46%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Rascal Riches vs 3x Catch
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Booongo — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: 3x Catch does not publish one.
- Volatility cannot be compared: 3x Catch does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Wealth.
Rascal Riches vs Book of Golden Sands
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.23% against 96.46% — Book of Golden Sands is 0.23 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.1×: 9,000× against 10,000×, with Book of Golden Sands higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
- Shared theme signals: Wealth.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
