Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Play’n GO

Play’n GO

PG Soft

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
Published RTP: 96.51% against 96.25% — Reactoonz is 0.26 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 1.7×: 3× against 5×, with Agent of Hearts higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Both carry the same volatility label: High.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Reactoonz returns more in theory over the long run, while Agent of Hearts reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.

Different format families: Reactoonz is Fixed paylines, Cruise Royale is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Play’n GO and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.51% against 96.65% — Cruise Royale is 0.14 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 833.3×: 3× against 2,500×, with Cruise Royale higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Cruise Royale does not publish a rating.

Add to the comparison (up to four)