Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Rich Wilde and the Tome of Madness
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.59%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 2,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
Legion Gold
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.23%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 2,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 96.59% against 96.23% — Rich Wilde and the Tome of Madness is 0.36 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 2,000× and 2,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Rich Wilde and the Tome of Madness returns more in theory over the long run, while Legion Gold reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Wealth.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
