Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Riches of RA
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.01%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 8,032×
- Reels
- 32
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
Sienna Steele
Microgaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.01%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Riches of RA vs Sienna Steele
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.01% against 96.01%.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
- Shared theme signals: Wealth.
Riches of RA vs Marlin Masters OG
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.01% against 96.25% — Marlin Masters OG is 0.24 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 8,032× and 7,500×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Marlin Masters OG does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Marlin Masters OG returns more in theory over the long run, while Riches of RA reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
