Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Royal Masquerade
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.51%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- 0
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS

Mystic Potion
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.70%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS

Lucky Dragon Ball
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Royal Masquerade vs Mystic Potion
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.51% against 96.70% — Mystic Potion is 0.19 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Mystic Potion does not publish a rating.
Royal Masquerade vs Lucky Dragon Ball
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Lucky Dragon Ball does not publish one.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
Add to the comparison (up to four)


