Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Samba Carnival
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 95.78%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 2×
- Reels
- 2
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Gemix
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.83%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 3×
- Reels
- 3
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Samba Carnival vs Gemix
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 95.78% against 96.83% — Gemix is 1.05 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.5×: 2× against 3×, with Gemix higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
Samba Carnival vs Dandy Diamonds
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Dandy Diamonds does not publish one.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Dandy Diamonds does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
