Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Shamrock Miner
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.29%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Music & party
VS
Spring Break
Microgaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.10%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Music & party
VS
Rave Party Fever
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.73%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Music & party
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Shamrock Miner vs Spring Break
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.29% against 96.10% — Shamrock Miner is 0.19 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
- Shared theme signals: Music & party.
Shamrock Miner vs Rave Party Fever
- Different format families: Shamrock Miner is Fixed paylines, Rave Party Fever is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.29% against 96.73% — Rave Party Fever is 0.44 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,000× and 5,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Rave Party Fever does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Music & party.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
