Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Stepping Diamonds
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 4,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Fruit & classic
VS
Diamonds are Forever 3 Lines
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.96%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 3,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Fruit & classic
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.20% against 96.96% — Diamonds are Forever 3 Lines is 0.76 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.3×: 4,000× against 3,000×, with Stepping Diamonds higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Diamonds are Forever 3 Lines does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Diamonds are Forever 3 Lines returns more in theory over the long run, while Stepping Diamonds reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Fruit & classic.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
