Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Sticky Joker
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.74%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 1,650×
- Reels
- 650
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Chronos Joker
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.54%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 1,600×
- Reels
- 600
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Funky Fortunez
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.74%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 2,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Sticky Joker vs Chronos Joker
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 96.74% against 96.54% — Sticky Joker is 0.20 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 1,650× and 1,600×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
Sticky Joker vs Funky Fortunez
- Different format families: Sticky Joker is Fixed paylines, Funky Fortunez is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.74% against 96.74%.
- Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 1,650× against 2,000×, with Funky Fortunez higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Funky Fortunez does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
