Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Super Flip
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.53%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Eastern Fury
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.53%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Animals
VS
Jack the Giant Hunter
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.75%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Super Flip vs Eastern Fury
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.53% against 96.53%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
Super Flip vs Jack the Giant Hunter
- Different format families: Super Flip is Fixed paylines, Jack the Giant Hunter is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.53% against 96.75% — Jack the Giant Hunter is 0.22 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Jack the Giant Hunter does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
