Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Super Flip Deluxe

Play’n GO

Format family
Fixed paylines
RTP
96.20%
Volatility
Medium
Win cap
1,200×
Reels
5
Theme signals
Not published
Free demo available →
VS

Wild Spells

Pragmatic Play

Format family
Fixed paylines
RTP
96.40%
Volatility
Medium
Win cap
1,450×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Fantasy
Free demo available →

Reading the difference

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • Published RTP: 96.20% against 96.40% — Wild Spells is 0.20 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
  • Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 1,200× against 1,450×, with Wild Spells higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
  • Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.

Add to the comparison (up to four)

Add to the comparison (up to four)