Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Sweet 27
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.10%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 645×
- Reels
- 3
- Theme signals
- Sweets
VS
Outsourced
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.08%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.10% against 96.08%.
- Win caps differ by about 7.8×: 645× against 5,000×, with Outsourced higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Outsourced does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Sweet 27 returns more in theory over the long run, while Outsourced reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
