Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Sweet Alchemy
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.52%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 3,000×
- Reels
- 0
- Theme signals
- Sweets
VS
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.52% against 96.30% — Sweet Alchemy is 0.22 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 3,000× against 2,500×, with Sweet Alchemy higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: 3 Cursed Chests: Hold & Win does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
