Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Tale of Kyubiko
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.30%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 2,250×
- Reels
- 3
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Horse's Treasures
Microgaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 3
- Theme signals
- Adventure, Wealth
VS
Totem Wonders
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.73%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 2,500×
- Reels
- 3
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Tale of Kyubiko vs Horse's Treasures
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Horse's Treasures does not publish one.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
Tale of Kyubiko vs Totem Wonders
- Different format families: Tale of Kyubiko is Fixed paylines, Totem Wonders is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.30% against 96.73% — Totem Wonders is 0.43 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.1×: 2,250× against 2,500×, with Totem Wonders higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Totem Wonders does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
