Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
The Last Sundown
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 18,000×
- Reels
- 0
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
The Dragon Tiger
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.53%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 18,125×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
3x Catch
Booongo
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Animals, Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
The Last Sundown vs The Dragon Tiger
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.20% against 96.53% — The Dragon Tiger is 0.33 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 18,000× and 18,125×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
The Last Sundown vs 3x Catch
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Booongo — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: 3x Catch does not publish one.
- Volatility cannot be compared: 3x Catch does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
