Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Play’n GO

Microgaming

Nolimit City

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.26% against 96.27%.
Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.

Different format families: The Paying Piano Club is Fixed paylines, Outsourced is Ways to win. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.26% against 96.08% — The Paying Piano Club is 0.18 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,000× and 5,000×.
Volatility cannot be compared: Outsourced does not publish a rating.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. The Paying Piano Club returns more in theory over the long run, while Outsourced reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.

Add to the comparison (up to four)