Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
The Wild Class
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 6,666×
- Reels
- 666
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Blood & Shadow
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.13%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 6,666×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.20% against 96.13% — The Wild Class is 0.07 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 6,666× and 6,666×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Blood & Shadow does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. The Wild Class returns more in theory over the long run, while Blood & Shadow reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
