Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Tomb of Gold
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.29%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 7,000×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Adventure, Wealth
VS
Money On Reels Super Arrow
Microgaming
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.09%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.29% against 96.09% — Tomb of Gold is 0.20 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
- Shared theme signals: Wealth.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
