Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Tomb of Gold
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.29%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 7,000×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Adventure, Wealth
VS
Pixies vs Pirates
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 95.91%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 11,907×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Adventure
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.29% against 95.91% — Tomb of Gold is 0.38 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.7×: 7,000× against 11,907×, with Pixies vs Pirates higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Pixies vs Pirates does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Tomb of Gold returns more in theory over the long run, while Pixies vs Pirates reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Adventure.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
