Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Tome of Madness Bingo
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 97.38%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 4,250×
- Reels
- 250
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Dragon Legend
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 97.15%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 3,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 97.38% against 97.15% — Tome of Madness Bingo is 0.23 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.4×: 4,250× against 3,000×, with Tome of Madness Bingo higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Dragon Legend does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
