Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Play’n GO

PG Soft

Nolimit City

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Play’n GO and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 97.38% against 97.15% — Tome of Madness Bingo is 0.23 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 1.4×: 4,250× against 3,000×, with Tome of Madness Bingo higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Dragon Legend does not publish a rating.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 97.38% against 96.61% — Tome of Madness Bingo is 0.77 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 1.5×: 4,250× against 2,796×, with Tome of Madness Bingo higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Wixx does not publish a rating.

Add to the comparison (up to four)