Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Tower Quest Legacy
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.28%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 1,500×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Adventure
VS
Cloud Quest
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.64%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 2,500×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Adventure
VS
Bonny’s Treasures
Microgaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.09%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Adventure
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Tower Quest Legacy vs Cloud Quest
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 96.28% against 96.64% — Cloud Quest is 0.36 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.7×: 1,500× against 2,500×, with Cloud Quest higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
- Shared theme signals: Adventure.
Tower Quest Legacy vs Bonny’s Treasures
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.28% against 96.09% — Tower Quest Legacy is 0.19 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Volatility labels differ: Medium against High. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.
- Shared theme signals: Adventure.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
