Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Troll Hunters
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.69%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 15×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Golden Ticket
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.69%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 15×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
Forbidden Alchemy
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.68%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 8,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Troll Hunters vs Golden Ticket
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.69% against 96.69%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 15× and 15×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
Troll Hunters vs Forbidden Alchemy
- Different format families: Troll Hunters is Fixed paylines, Forbidden Alchemy is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.69% against 96.68%.
- Win caps differ by about 533.3×: 15× against 8,000×, with Forbidden Alchemy higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Forbidden Alchemy does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Troll Hunters returns more in theory over the long run, while Forbidden Alchemy reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
