Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
USA Flip
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- 0
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Invading Vegas
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- 0
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Outsourced
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.08%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
USA Flip vs Invading Vegas
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.20% against 96.20%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,000× and 5,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
USA Flip vs Outsourced
- Different format families: USA Flip is Fixed paylines, Outsourced is Ways to win. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.20% against 96.08% — USA Flip is 0.12 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,000× and 5,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Outsourced does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. USA Flip returns more in theory over the long run, while Outsourced reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
