Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
ValhalLuck
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.25%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 3,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Shining Hot 100
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.32%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 2,500×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Three Crazy Piggies
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.72%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 2,500×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Animals
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
ValhalLuck vs Shining Hot 100
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.25% against 96.32% — Shining Hot 100 is 0.07 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 3,000× against 2,500×, with ValhalLuck higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Shining Hot 100 returns more in theory over the long run, while ValhalLuck reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
ValhalLuck vs Three Crazy Piggies
- Different format families: ValhalLuck is Fixed paylines, Three Crazy Piggies is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.25% against 96.72% — Three Crazy Piggies is 0.47 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 3,000× against 2,500×, with ValhalLuck higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Three Crazy Piggies does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Three Crazy Piggies returns more in theory over the long run, while ValhalLuck reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
