Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Play’n GO

Hacksaw Gaming

Pragmatic Play

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.71% against 96.20% — Viking Runecraft is 0.51 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 2.0×: 5,000× against 2,500×, with Viking Runecraft higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Magic Piggy OG does not publish a rating.
Shared theme signals: Fantasy.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.71% against 96.40% — Viking Runecraft is 0.31 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 3.4×: 5,000× against 1,450×, with Viking Runecraft higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
Shared theme signals: Fantasy.

Add to the comparison (up to four)