Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Viking Runecraft: Apocalypse
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- 7
- Theme signals
- Norse myth, Fantasy
VS
Book of Vikings
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 6,600×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Norse myth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.50% against 96.50%.
- Win caps differ by about 1.5×: 10,000× against 6,600×, with Viking Runecraft: Apocalypse higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Book of Vikings returns more in theory over the long run, while Viking Runecraft: Apocalypse reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Norse myth.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
