Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Viking Runecraft Bingo
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 95.87%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 2,075×
- Reels
- 75
- Theme signals
- Norse myth, Fantasy
VS
Fairytale Fortune
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.52%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 3,200×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia, Fantasy
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 95.87% against 96.52% — Fairytale Fortune is 0.65 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.5×: 2,075× against 3,200×, with Fairytale Fortune higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.
- Shared theme signals: Fantasy.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
