Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Wild Blood
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.24%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 100,000×
- Reels
- 0
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Crazy Cows
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.24%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 100,000×
- Reels
- 0
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Deadwood R.I.P
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.09%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 100,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Horror
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Wild Blood vs Crazy Cows
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.24% against 96.24%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 100,000× and 100,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
Wild Blood vs Deadwood R.I.P
- Different format families: Wild Blood is Fixed paylines, Deadwood R.I.P is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.24% against 96.09% — Wild Blood is 0.15 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 100,000× and 100,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Deadwood R.I.P does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Wild Blood returns more in theory over the long run, while Deadwood R.I.P reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
