Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Wild Falls 2
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 15,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Trees of Treasure
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.10%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 15,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Adventure, Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.20% against 96.10% — Wild Falls 2 is 0.10 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 15,000× and 15,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Wild Falls 2 returns more in theory over the long run, while Trees of Treasure reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
