Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Wild Frames
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 7,000×
- Reels
- 7
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Mysterious Egypt
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 7,100×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Egypt
VS
Super Golf Drive
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.77%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 8,000×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Wild Frames vs Mysterious Egypt
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.50% against 96.50%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 7,000× and 7,100×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
Wild Frames vs Super Golf Drive
- Different format families: Wild Frames is Fixed paylines, Super Golf Drive is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.50% against 96.77% — Super Golf Drive is 0.27 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.1×: 7,000× against 8,000×, with Super Golf Drive higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Super Golf Drive does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
