Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Wild Melon
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 93.72%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 33×
- Reels
- 33
- Theme signals
- Fruit & classic
VS
Nashville 777 Retro Roller
Microgaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 92.00%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 3
- Theme signals
- Fruit & classic
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 93.72% against 92.00% — Wild Melon is 1.72 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Volatility labels differ: Medium against High. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.
- Shared theme signals: Fruit & classic.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
