Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Win-A-Beest
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.12%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 10,240×
- Reels
- 240
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Supreme Zeus
Hacksaw Gaming
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.39%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 12,500×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Greek myth
VS
3x Catch
Booongo
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Animals, Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Win-A-Beest vs Supreme Zeus
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.12% against 96.39% — Supreme Zeus is 0.27 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 10,240× against 12,500×, with Supreme Zeus higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Supreme Zeus does not publish a rating.
Win-A-Beest vs 3x Catch
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Booongo — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: 3x Catch does not publish one.
- Volatility cannot be compared: 3x Catch does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
