Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Xmas Magic
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 20,000×
- Reels
- 0
- Theme signals
- Fantasy
VS
Wild Spells
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.40%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 1,450×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Fantasy
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Play’n GO and Pragmatic Play — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.50% against 96.40% — Xmas Magic is 0.10 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 13.8×: 20,000× against 1,450×, with Xmas Magic higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
- Shared theme signals: Fantasy.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
