Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
3 Dancing Monkeys
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.00%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 12,077×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Animals
VS
Catfish Hunters
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.03%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 20,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Animals
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.00% against 96.03%.
- Win caps differ by about 1.7×: 12,077× against 20,000×, with Catfish Hunters higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Catfish Hunters does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Animals.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
