Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
3 Dancing Monkeys
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.00%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 12,077×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Animals
VS
Buffalo King Untamed Megaways™
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.02%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Animals
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.00% against 96.02%.
- Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 12,077× against 10,000×, with 3 Dancing Monkeys higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility labels differ: High against Medium. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Buffalo King Untamed Megaways™ returns more in theory over the long run, while 3 Dancing Monkeys reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Animals.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
