Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
African Elephant
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.04%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 15,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Animals
VS
Hand of Midas 2
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.07%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 8,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Animals
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.04% against 96.07%.
- Win caps differ by about 1.9×: 15,000× against 8,000×, with African Elephant higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Hand of Midas 2 returns more in theory over the long run, while African Elephant reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Animals.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
