Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Alien Invaders
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Sci-fi & neon
VS
Cyberheist City
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Sci-fi & neon
VS
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Alien Invaders vs Cyberheist City
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cascading reels. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.50% against 96.50%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,000× and 5,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.
- Shared theme signals: Sci-fi & neon.
Alien Invaders vs Great Game Rockies
- Different format families: Alien Invaders is Cascading reels, Great Game Rockies is Fixed paylines. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.50% against 96.33% — Alien Invaders is 0.17 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,000× and 5,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Great Game Rockies does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Alien Invaders returns more in theory over the long run, while Great Game Rockies reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
