Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Asgard
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.48%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 600×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Norse myth
VS
Thunderstruck
Microgaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.10%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Norse myth
VS
Fruits Fever 5 lines
Booongo
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Fruit & classic
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Asgard vs Thunderstruck
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.48% against 96.10% — Asgard is 0.38 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Volatility labels differ: Low against High. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.
- Shared theme signals: Norse myth.
Asgard vs Fruits Fever 5 lines
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Booongo — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Fruits Fever 5 lines does not publish one.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Fruits Fever 5 lines does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
