Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Asgard
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.48%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 600×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Norse myth
VS
Tales of Asgard: Freya's Wedding
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.40%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 2,500×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Norse myth
VS
Thor Hammer Time
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.03%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 2,328×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Norse myth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Asgard vs Tales of Asgard: Freya's Wedding
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.48% against 96.40% — Asgard is 0.08 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 4.2×: 600× against 2,500×, with Tales of Asgard: Freya's Wedding higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility labels differ: Low against Medium. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Asgard returns more in theory over the long run, while Tales of Asgard: Freya's Wedding reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Norse myth.
Asgard vs Thor Hammer Time
- Different format families: Asgard is Fixed paylines, Thor Hammer Time is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.48% against 96.03% — Asgard is 0.45 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 3.9×: 600× against 2,328×, with Thor Hammer Time higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Thor Hammer Time does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Asgard returns more in theory over the long run, while Thor Hammer Time reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Norse myth.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
