Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Aztec Bonanza
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.53%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 19,440×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Hell Butcher
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.55%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 20,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Xmas Magic
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 20,000×
- Reels
- 0
- Theme signals
- Fantasy
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Aztec Bonanza vs Hell Butcher
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cascading reels. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.53% against 96.55%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 19,440× and 20,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
Aztec Bonanza vs Xmas Magic
- Different format families: Aztec Bonanza is Cascading reels, Xmas Magic is Fixed paylines. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.53% against 96.50%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 19,440× and 20,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Aztec Bonanza returns more in theory over the long run, while Xmas Magic reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
