Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Pragmatic Play

Play’n GO

Pragmatic Play

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Different format families: Aztec Smash is Cascading reels, Wild Falls is Fixed paylines. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.52% against 96.50%.
Win caps differ by about 1.1×: 9,000× against 10,000×, with Wild Falls higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Aztec Smash returns more in theory over the long run, while Wild Falls reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Cascading reels. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.52% against 96.49%.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 9,000× and 9,000×.
Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Aztec Smash returns more in theory over the long run, while Witch Heart Megaways™ reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.

Add to the comparison (up to four)