Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Pragmatic Play

Play’n GO

PG Soft

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.51% against 96.58% — Stadium of Riches is 0.07 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 1.1×: 4,500× against 5,000×, with Stadium of Riches higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Both carry the same volatility label: High.
Shared theme signals: Wealth.

Different format families: Black Bull is Fixed paylines, Forge of Wealth is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.51% against 96.74% — Forge of Wealth is 0.23 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 1.1×: 4,500× against 5,000×, with Forge of Wealth higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Forge of Wealth does not publish a rating.
Shared theme signals: Wealth.

Add to the comparison (up to four)

Gaelic Gold Nolimit City47%