Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Blade & Fangs

Pragmatic Play

Format family
Ways to win
RTP
95.02%
Volatility
High
Win cap
5,000×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Not published
Free demo available →
VS

Outsourced

Nolimit City

Format family
Ways to win
RTP
96.08%
Volatility
Not published
Win cap
5,000×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Not published
Free demo available →
VS

3x Catch

Booongo

Format family
Ways to win
RTP
Not published
Volatility
Not published
Win cap
Not published
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Animals, Wealth
Free demo available →

Reading the difference

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Blade & Fangs vs Outsourced

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • Published RTP: 95.02% against 96.08% — Outsourced is 1.06 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
  • Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,000× and 5,000×.
  • Volatility cannot be compared: Outsourced does not publish a rating.

Blade & Fangs vs 3x Catch

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Booongo — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • RTP cannot be compared: 3x Catch does not publish one.
  • Volatility cannot be compared: 3x Catch does not publish a rating.

Add to the comparison (up to four)

Add to the comparison (up to four)