Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Blade & Fangs
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 95.02%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Furry Bonanza Megaways™
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Outsourced
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.08%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Blade & Fangs vs Furry Bonanza Megaways™
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- RTP cannot be compared: Furry Bonanza Megaways™ does not publish one.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,000× and 5,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
Blade & Fangs vs Outsourced
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 95.02% against 96.08% — Outsourced is 1.06 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,000× and 5,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Outsourced does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
